If Web 2.0 were that easy, we would have done it already

Let's get straight into it, shall we? The internet is a powerful, impressionable and highly malleable corporate playground that will forever change shape to fit the culture of those who use it. The internet, althought young, is a shape-shifter. A prime example of such shape-shifting is highly prevalent in the existing Web 2.0 aesthetic. For the oblivious readers, Web 2.0 is essentially just a colloquial term to describe a movement from first generation internet to the second (obviously), but this little transformation entails a different emphasis on the way the web conducts itself. Web 2.0 emphasises usability, and usability means simple designs and heightened functionality. In summation, a lot of good has come out of it but there has also been a lot of garbage as well.

I'm sick of reading articles and blogs emphasising how easy it is to achieve absurd levels of success through web 2.0...  If web 2.0 were that easy, we would have all made millions and would have done it already. It is in this simple, yet astute observation that we can siphon through the Web 2.0 dumping ground to uncover a couple of simple truths.

Firstly, from a technical point of view, Web 2.0 is a complete paradox of itself. How? Well, people want simple designs but with heightened functionality. Sounds easy, doesn't it? Not really... Programmers (not so much designers) and their innovative ability are being pushed to their limit in putting together the cogs that power such 'simple' designs. This is unquestionably great for the development of the internet, but yeah, it's a tiresome effort!

Secondly, 'making money' on the internet involves the sheep-like following of highly ambiguous 'success' formulas that seem to do nothing more than contribute to the mass of cyber-pollution that seems to be building a larger ball of garbage that is perpetually hurling faster and faster down the slopes of the Web 2.0 mountain. I'll tell you the truth about these formulas, as they all have a hidden, underlying message that many people seem to surpass in their absorption of regurgitated content. When someone on the internet says "Buy my book, it will teach you how to build a following on twitter" what they actually mean is "hey, I'm making money off of the folly of of uneductaed users buying their way into Web 2.0, you should too by publishing your own crappy e-book and baiting it to the flock." I guess you could say that the most notorious offenders in this category of Web 2.0 fall under 'social media', but they are the users abusing it incorrectly. Social Media is the best thing that happened to the internet, however like all existing media avenues, there are ways to abuse it to your own advantage. Companies and individuals are more than entitled to use social media to advertise, because they actually offer a service or product on the internet - hell, I'm even going to link back to one of my clients at the end of this post. The thing is, though, offering a genuine product or service isn't preying on your average Joe Blow of Web 2.0, who doesn't know their left foot from their right foot by saying that making money on the web is easy - cos it's not.

Making money involves hard work, and ingenuity. Not every person possesses the same level of innovation as others out there. I for one, am sick of seeing certain bloggers and designers, mass marketing the simplicity of innovation to hordes of readers entranced by the success of other people. Tell it like it is. Look at it this way, if you want to know how a car runs - Do you analyse the body or the engine? Bloggers need to be more informative about the gearing of Web 2.0, rather than coaxing people to buy into the deception of its 'simplicity'. Omitting the mechanics of your online success only makes the garbage ball bigger.

______________________________________________________________________________


If you're looking for a decent roaming SIM card, or even if you're unfamiliar with international mobile roaming, BackChat Mobile is an Australian company dedicated to lowering the cost of global roaming worldwide. Check them out if you need to get hooked up with an international sim card when traveling overseas!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  Global Roaming   Internet   Making Money   Web 2.0   Web Design  
Comments (0)
Posted 5 months ago by Mark 

No Pants is the New Black?

In the midst of my mindless flickering back and forth between music channels on cable TV, one can't help but notice the choice of wardrobe on some female pop-stars... None of them are wearing pants.

Am I the only one on planet earth who sees this new found trend? I mean, when did it all start? Well, we know that it started in the prehistoric ages, but I'm pretty sure that at some point in the twentieth century, women stopped wearing corsets and long-dresses made from lead and iron-ore and started wearing pants, the social aesthetic that is universally accepted. For years, pop-stars and actresses on screen wore pants (even though some opted to take photo's with them off), but when they paraded around on screen, they wore pants. PANTS!

But what about female sex sirens? Even they wore pants. Once upon a time, Madonna actually wore pants. In the 80s, Bananarama wore pants. Even Salt 'N Pepa wore pants (short ones, but they were still pants). In the 90s, unless you were in a Snoop Dogg video - you WORE PANTS.

Now, journey forward into the 'futuristic' age (The present, for all those playing at home), turn on MTV or VH1, and examine the wardrobe of many of the sultry vixens on screen. Lady Gaga explodes into the music business, never wearing pants. Even well-established icons, such as Beyonce Knowles, Madonna and even Christina Aguilera change the way they go about things -- In many of their film clips they are in fact, wait for it.... NOT WEARING PANTS. Even the soulful are opting to no longer wear pants... Take the singer Duffy for example, her music videos might not depict such pantlessness, but her live shows speak otherwise as she graces the stages wearing nothing but a skimpy pantless leotard and a Blazer.

I think it's safe to say that for women in this day and age, no pants is beginning to establish itself as the new black. With such 'in-your-face' pantsless antics so easily accessible to children on TV, maybe it's giving the wrong message. I don't know... I just really don't like Lady Gaga - it's like a man's head with a pantsless woman's body and the androgyny confuses my ability to decipher between neutral genders. What do you think, anyway?

____________________________________________________________

On another note, I'm looking at picking up a roaming SIM card for international travel for when I head over to Europe later in the year. I've heard BackChat Mobile have some pretty decent global roaming deals for prepaid call cards, has anybody here ever used them before? I've heard they're pretty decent. Anyway, until my next blog, peace :-P

 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  Beyonce   Duffy   Global Roaming   Lady Gaga   Madonna   No Pants   Roaming SIM  
Comments (0)
Posted 6 months ago by Mark